A recent discovery could increase older women's chances of having babies.
7 comments
Karen Weintraub
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Last time I checked there wasn't a shortage of humans on the Earth.... so that means this is being done so that UN-necessary excess children can be brought into the world to starve.  Ignorance obviously isn't  the sole domain of the religious. Medical research isn't just about giving ignorant selfish people what they want.
The research work is very sound in fulfulling child bearingaspirations of significant population of women folks whosereproductive difficulties correlate with age. But the hallmark question arises !! How broad based in our thinking are wein guaranteeing that advanced age child bearing trend, is not onlyrisk free to the mother,but produces wholesome humans that meetfast thinking dynamics of ever changing human society ? It is not funny when I put in 'pointblank' to an intended ladyin her 30s that any conception and delivery to my smart kid,or kids, must be accomplished before her 40th birthday,otherwise,the line of thought is permanently eliminated.We live at smarter time,and must act smarter,at all times,especially,on matters that touch on human life.Martin Atayo
with the advances in medical science related to DNA and stem cells a lot of questions arise.My children -if they make it to 50- might actually be able to get to 1000. I'd wonder specifically about the redwood forests trees. I don't think there is an analagous 'stem' cell for plant matter, but all I've read so far in stem cell research is related to the eventual decay(or loss) of the protein that actually feeds the 'replication cycle' of the DNA in the cells to start with. I wonder about plant cells and their replication abilities- do we understand enough about how it works to avoid some very costly mistakes when we make changes to God's versions (the natural order of things-not necessarily the best one?).AKA sickle cell anemia being resistant to malarial spyrochetes(sp?). Seems a choice of 'druthers'.....
I'm not sure that's a good idea. I wouldn't want to be putting a kid thru college when I'm on Social Security. Kellyhttp://www.zazzle.com
I wait for the technology to being issued because I couldn't have a baby in my mid40s and still don't have one. Thanks
@nadbaj Regardless of sophistication of the any technology,a baby over an age 40 is not highly encouragedbecause of problems of offspring wholesomenessand socio-cultural and biophysical-chemistry dynamicsassociated with expectant mother.A smarter society with sound planning system must dissuadeand discourage child bearing at an age above 40 to ensuresmarter population.Martin AtayoWashington,DC
But the nearly 30 children who resulted from this work ended up with DNA from two women as well as their father. (It's not clear whether the children suffered any health consequences.) By being her own source for the younger mitochondria, a woman could avoid that potentially dangerous mix of DNA, Tilly says. Twin sons of different mothers? The four horsemen are more related tp the nature of the beast- war famine pestilence and death is a matter of morals- choices if you will. ie corporate welfare- where feeding the machine is more important than feeding the people. Rain water collection, urban farms, abundance rather than price manipulation/greed. Weather control s still debated thpugh possible (silver iodide, microwve/water natural frequency, etc....). Weather studies show having water brings more water (thermal convective?). And Abraham's wife was how old? with how many children? The promise of God doesn't include the mistakes man would make along the way.
